
Project Experience
Financial services
worries over "channel conflict"
can stall efforts to explore alternative distribution channels, providing
an opening for competitors.
Client Situation
Within the financial services industry, insurance companies have been
particularly slow to move toward Internet distribution because of perceived
conflicts with the agent model, as well as a belief that most insurance
products require face-to-face sales. Property and casualty products
were the first to move to Internet distribution, but the move was initiated
by Internet startups devoted to overturning existing insurance distribution
models, rather than the underwriters themselves. Only now are underwriters
cautiously testing Internet distribution of property and casualty products;
most still insist that direct distribution will not work with life and
health products other than simple term products.
Fuld Approach
Our client sought an objective look at the current capabilities and future
plans of its competitors, both traditional and non-traditional, with regard
to the distribution of disability income products. In addition to interviewing
multiple underwriters, we spoke with leading on-line insurance distributors
to develop a full understanding of their business models and product selection
criteria.
Benefits and Implications
Our research showed that, while disability income products as currently
structured are poor candidates for Internet distribution, other product
lines of significant importance to our client's overall strategy were
being targeted for direct distribution. Our client used our findings to
convince senior management that direct distribution merited a significant
investment in order to prevent competitors from capturing market share.
For more information on distribution strategies in financial services,
please contactlscanlon@fuld.com.
|